The browser you use can have a tremendous impact on the battery life of your laptop. That’s because some are designed to be more power efficient than others. Does this mean that more power efficient browsers will also have lower performance? Well, not necessarily. Power efficiency and performance are not always directly proportional to each other, so it’s important for you to find your perfect balance in a browser.
An Energy-Efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2002), 1567–1576. Abstract This paper proposes S-MAC, a medium-access control (MAC) protocol designed for wireless sensor networks. Abstract-Energy efficiency is the kernel issue in the designing of wireless sensor network(WSN) MAC protocols. Energy efficiency is a major consideration while designing wireless sensor network nodes. Most sensor network applications require energy autonomy for the complete lifetime of the node, which may span up to several years.
Take a look on some of the browsers that have proven to be the most power efficient (i.e. How to delete mail app from mac using terminal. less taxing on your battery life) for Mac and see how they stack up.
Energy Efficient Mac Apps Download
The Experiment
https://renewgifts873.weebly.com/blog/best-personal-finance-app-mac-os. For my control I tried to be as practical as possible in relating to how people use web browsers most often. I conducted two tests in every browser. One had guidingtech.com open in one tab with a YouTube video playing in another. Best note taker app for mac. The other test just had guidingtech.com, omitting the video. I also made sure to disable all extensions in all browsers and that no pages were loading, since loading a page will always quickly spike energy impact.
Anne rice vampire chronicles ebook free download. Browsers used were Safari, Chrome, Firefox, Opera and Vivaldi. I used Apple’s Activity Monitor app that comes with every Mac running the latest software to determine which browsers had the highest energy impact and lowest energy impact. The two scores for each browser represent impact with video and without.
Note: Extensions and ad blockers can often affect the energy impact of a browser, so take your own extensions into consideration when choosing a suitable browser.
Top Pick: Safari
Safari beat all the other browsers on the Mac in terms of power efficiency. In fact, it really wasn’t even close. Some of the other browsers had higher energy impacts without video than Safari did with video.
While only having one tab open for Guiding Tech, Safari’s energy impact fluctuated between 0 and 3. At some points it got down as low to 0.2, but generally hovered around 2. With a video playing, it fluctuated between 10 and 20 but stayed around 12.
Safari has the best power efficiency out of any browser I tested. And the convenient part about that is your Mac already has it installed.
How the Competition Stacked Up
Opera, Chrome and Firefox were all pretty close to each other with their scores. Generally speaking, with just Guiding Tech as the sole open tab, they each had an energy impact of 10 to 15. Like Safari, they would fluctuate too. Once again, when a YouTube video started playing in a second tab, energy impacts jumped up to between 40 and 60 and would fluctuate for all of them.
These scores are significantly higher than Safari’s scores and thus, these browsers have more of a negative impact on battery life.
Despite its rich feature set, Vivaldi pathetically lost this competition. With an energy impact of around 67 with just Guiding Tech loaded, it was sucking more from your battery than Safari was with a video playing. If battery life is at all important to you, avoid Vivaldi at least until the developers release some solid updates.
The bottom line is to make the most out of your limited battery life on a MacBook, you’re better off using Safari. Other factors like performance and security aside, it’s unlikely to drain your battery as fast as competing browsers.
Note: Activity Monitor’s energy impact ratings are calculated from a number of different battery and CPU-related metrics, but Apple has never specifically stated what those are.
The above article may contain affiliate links which help support Guiding Tech. However, it does not affect our editorial integrity. The content remains unbiased and authentic.Also See
Energy Efficient Mac Apps App
#battery #browser
Did You Know
Landscaping software for mac. The Tesla Gigafactory 1 is the biggest battery factory in the world. Mac shortcut to see all running apps. Pokemon iso for ppsspp.
More in Internet and Social
A Guide to Scheduling Emails in Gmail on Mobile and Desktop
Energy Efficient Mac Apps Downloads
Shih, E., Bahl, P., Sinclair, M.J.: Wake on Wireless: An Event Driven Energy Saving Strategy for Battery Operated Devices. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (2002)Google Scholar
Raghavendra, C.S., Singh, S.: PAMAS-power aware multi-access protocol with signaing for ad hoc networks. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Rev. 28(3), 5–26 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Ye, W., Heidemann, J.: Schedule and Latency Control in S-MAC. Poster, in UCLA CENS research review (2003)Google Scholar
Zheng, R., Hou, J.C., Sha, L.: Asynchronous Wakeup For Ad Hoc Networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, pp. 35–45 (2003)Google Scholar
Miller, M.J., Vaidya, N.: Minimization Energy Consumption in Sensor Networks Using a Wakeup Radio. In: Proc. Wireless Communications and Networking Conf., pp. 120–125 (2004)Google Scholar
Yang, X., Vaidya, N.H.: A Wakeup Scheme for Sensor Networks: Achieving Balance between Energy saving and End-to-end Delay. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium, pp. 19–26 (2004)Google Scholar
Kalidindi, R., Ray, L., Kannan, R., Lyengar, S.: Distributed Eergy Aware MAC Layer Protocol For Wireless Sensor Networks. In: International Conference on Wireless Networks, Las Vegas, Nevada (June 2003)Google Scholar
Lu, G., Krishnamachari, B., Raghavendra, C.S.: An Adaptive Energy- Efficient and Low-Latency MAC for Data Gathering in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proc. of the 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, IPDPS 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
Zheng, R., Kravets, R.: On-demand Power Management for Ad Hoc Networks. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, INFOCOM 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
Schurgers, C., Tsiatsis, V., Ganeriwal, S., Srivastava, M.: Topology Management for Sensor Networks: Exploiting Latency and Density. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc 2002), pp. 135–145 (2002)Google Scholar
Ye, W., Heidemann, J., Estin, D.: An energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: 21st Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), June 2002, vol. 3, pp. 1567–1576 (2002)Google Scholar
van Dam, T., Langendoen, K.: An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems (SenSys 2003), pp. 171–180 (2003)Google Scholar
Miller, M.J., Vaidya, N.H.: Power save mechanisms for multi-hop wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Broadband Networks, pp. 518–526 (2004)Google Scholar